Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Trey Hilderbrand vs Lucca C Pignaton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hilderbrand vs Pignaton analysis and find out who is favored!
Trey Hilderbrand vs Lucca C Pignaton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hilderbrand 1 - 0 Pignaton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hilderbrand has won 47.22% of points on their second serve, while Pignaton has won 29.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hilderbrand, in recent form, has won 49.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pignaton has won 43.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.16% and 23.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hilderbrand has saved 56.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pignaton has saved 58.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hilderbrand has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Pignaton winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hilderbrand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 44/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Pignaton has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Hilderbrand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.22% of matches (W/L 28/ 17), where as Pignaton has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hilderbrand winning 1 times and Pignaton being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hilderbrand winning 2 and Pignaton winning 0. The last match between Hilderbrand and Pignaton was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 06-03-2024, First, Hard with Trey Hilderbrand getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hilderbrand and Pignaton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hilderbrand winning 0 times and Pignaton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hilderbrand winning 0, and Pignaton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hilderbrand has played against opponents with an average rank of 145.63 while Pignaton has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hilderbrand has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pignaton has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hilderbrand has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pignaton has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
810
Rank
810
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
59% (75-52)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-5)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Trey Hilderbrand vs Lucca C Pignaton For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hilderbrand VS Pignaton
Sportsbook
Offer
Hilderbrand VS Pignaton H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Trey Hilderbrand | Lucca C Pignaton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (37/63) | 67% (44/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (30/37) | 70% (31/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (12/26) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (26/66) | 33% (21/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Hilderbrand VS Pignaton H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Lucca C Pignaton
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
8
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Trey Hilderbrand | Lucca C Pignaton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 0% (0/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (40/30) | 0% (0/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (363/325) | 32% (23/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 197 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 107 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1227/1928) | 61% (80/131) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (882/1227) | 71% (57/80) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (331/701) | 29% (15/51) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (77/176) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (725/1924) | 32% (37/117) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (4/0) |
Trey Hilderbrand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
3
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Gonzalo Bueno
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
102)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Leonardo Aboian
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
51 of
67)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Juan Sebastian Gomez
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Gonzalo Ariel Karakachian
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
3
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Lucca C Pignaton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Lucca C Pignaton
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Lucca C Pignaton
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
8
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Hilderbrand Vs Pignaton Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hilderbrand are available here and Pignaton photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
